Should Congress Give Medals to Heroes Who Died on September 11th?
The House voted 409-0 to award the nation's highest
public-safety award to the heroes who died in the Sept. 11 attacks. After the
New York Post reported that Sen. Patrick Leahy was blocking the plan to honor
those who perished, he reversed his decision.
Update on Medal of Valor Issue
April 12, 2002
CONTACT:
Office of Senator Leahy, 202-224-4242 - VERMONT
FYI, Senator Leahy, in answering a
question in the Senate Radio-TV Gallery this morning, said all three
resolutions will be on the Judiciary Committee's agenda at its voting
session next Thursday. They are:
H.Con.Res.243, passed by the House;
S.Con.Res.75, introduced by Sen. Harkin
(cosponsored by Sen. Schumer, Sen. Clinton and others)
S.Con.Res.66, introduced by Sen. Stevens
Senator Leahy said he expects to support all of
them and any consensus resolution. Note earlier statement for details on
inaccuracies in the New York Post story today on this subject.
Comment Of David Carle,
Spokesman For Senator Patrick Leahy,
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee,
On The New York Post Article
About Public Safety Officer Medal Of Valor Awards
April 12, 2002
The New York Post story is inaccurate and
highly misleading.
The New York Post asked whether the resolution
would be voted on by the Judiciary Committee, and the Post's reporter
did not return a call to hear the answer.
The non-binding resolution that has passed the
House and that is pending in the Senate is likely to be considered in
the Senate Judiciary Committee this month.
The issue is not whether awards should be given
to fallen firefighters, police and other
public safety officers involved in the
September 11 attacks, but how to do it in a way that makes this award
one that is as credible and as meaningful as possible.
In setting up the Public Safety Officer Medal
of Valor Award nearly a year ago, well before the terrorist attacks,
Congress and the President decided that the award would have the most
meaning, endurance and credibility if firefighters and police and other
public safety officers themselves - the peers of those who will be
honored - made the selections of candidates. Congress and the White
House decided that this arrangement was better than for Congress itself
to make the decisions. The New York Post says only five awards can be
given in any year. The Post is wrong, failing to report that the very
next line in the law says that the attorney general can increase that
number, without limit, at his discretion, in extraordinary cases. No one
can argue that September 11 was not an extraordinary case.
In the long term, it will be best for the
medal's credibility if the award returns to a peer-selection process so
that firefighters, police and other public safety officers themselves
select candidates. But because of the extraordinary circumstances of
September 11, Congress may itself choose to step into the process this
year, and if that is the will of the Senate as well as of the House,
Senator Leahy will support that step. In the meantime, Senator Leahy -
longtime champion of firefighters and police and public safety officers
in Congress -- has been leading every effort underway in Congress to
offer tangible help to them after September 11, including increases in
public safety officer death and disability benefits, grants for
bulletproof vests and creation of the September 11 Victims Compensation
Fund.
|